‘Concealment of daughter’ IHC seeks reply from IK in disqualification petition – Pakistan

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad Excessive Courtroom (IHC) directed the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan to submit a reply in a petition searching for his disqualification as a lawmaker for “concealing his alleged daughter” within the nomination papers.

A single bench of Chief Justice Aamer Farooq on Tuesday heard the petition of a citizen, Muhammad Sajid. The IHC within the final listening to had issued a pre-admission discover to the PTI chief and the Election Fee of Pakistan (ECP) to assist the court docket o resolve if the petition is maintainable?

In the course of the listening to, Khan’s authorized workforce comprising Salman Akram Raja, Azhar Siddique, and Abuzar Salman Niazi appeared earlier than the Courtroom.

Salman Akram Raja argued {that a} verdict in an equivalent case had already been introduced by the IHC. The ECP counsel endorsed the argument of Raja, saying that this matter had been raised earlier than the establishment many instances however the complaints had been dismissed.

The CJ IHC directed Khan’s counsel to submit his written reply on this matter. At that Raja prayed the court docket to grant a while. The bench accepting the request adjourned the case till 19 January 2023.

The petitioner has sought disqualification of the PTI chief, from his NA-95 Mianwali-I constituency, contending that every one candidates contesting elections for both nationwide or provincial assemblies are required to furnish an affidavit with respect of their credentials and belongings.

He stated that one such info is concerning the youngsters who’re depending on a candidate, and on this connection, Imran had wrongly talked about two youngsters together with “Qasim Khan and Sulaiman Khan” and had omitted the third.

He claimed, “The respondent no. 1 (Imran Khan) has intentionally and wilfully didn’t declare his daughter, Tyrian White, within the related columns of the nomination papers and the affidavit appended therewith; therefore, he’s not sagacious, righteous, sincere and a person of fine character by way of Article 62 of the Structure.”

He additionally stated that “Article 62 of the Structure, as interpreted by varied judgments of the superior courts, prescribes {that a} candidate shall solely qualify to be elected as a member of the Nationwide Meeting if he’s of fine character and isn’t generally generally known as one who violates Islamic Injunctions; and he has satisfactory data of Islamic teachings and practices; compulsory duties prescribed by Islam, in addition to, abstaining from main sins.”

The petitioner urged the court docket to summon the previous prime minister and inquire concerning the causes for the violation of Article 62 of the Structure, which says, “an individual shall not be certified to be elected or chosen as a member of Parliament until — he’s sagacious, righteous, non-profligate, sincere and ameen, there being no declaration on the contrary by a court docket of legislation”.

He additionally prayed to the court docket to query Imran for “submitting a false declaration and affidavit and as to why he ought to be allowed to be a member of the parliament … and is probably not de-seated in all collected penalties for the violation of the Structure and the legislation.”

Copyright Enterprise Recorder, 2022